Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Foreign Affairs, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Strengthens American Wi-Fi technology to protect against foreign threats and adversaries.
The problem
Foreign governments may use Wi-Fi vulnerabilities to spy on Americans or disrupt critical networks. U.S. Wi-Fi standards need protection from foreign interference.
The proposal
Establishes measures to advance American Wi-Fi technology and security standards while reducing dependence on foreign adversaries in wireless communications development.
The impact
American technology companies, telecommunications providers, and consumers benefit from stronger Wi-Fi security. Federal agencies coordinate security standards.
Stronger Wi-Fi standards reduce opportunities for foreign governments to spy through wireless networks. This protects sensitive government and private communications.
Boosting U.S. Wi-Fi technology keeps America competitive globally. American companies can develop stronger products and export them worldwide.
Better security standards mean safer internet for regular Americans at home and at work. Users get protection from hacking and surveillance.
Less reliance on foreign technology means America controls its own wireless future. This strengthens independence in critical communications.
Companies may spend more money upgrading Wi-Fi systems to meet new standards. Small businesses could face financial burden.
Focusing only on American standards might hurt cooperation with allied countries. Global Wi-Fi standards work better when countries collaborate.
Changing Wi-Fi standards nationwide takes time and coordination. Confusion during transition could disrupt services temporarily.
The bill has no official summary yet, making it hard to evaluate exact costs and requirements. Details matter for understanding real impact.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.