Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Natural Resources, and in addition to the Committee on Agriculture, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
A bill about managing parks and public lands, currently under review by Congress.
The problem
The bill addresses issues related to public parks and natural resource management, though specific details are not yet available in official documentation.
The proposal
The bill would make changes to how parks and public lands are managed, with provisions reviewed by both Natural Resources and Agriculture committees.
The impact
Affects park visitors, outdoor recreationists, land managers, agriculture interests, and communities near public lands and parks.
The bill may improve how public lands and parks are managed. Better management could protect natural areas and wildlife. This helps preserve nature for future generations.
Parks provide places for Americans to enjoy outdoor activities. Clear park management rules could make parks safer and more accessible. This benefits families and outdoor enthusiasts.
Well-managed parks attract visitors who spend money locally. Businesses near parks benefit from tourism. This can create jobs in gateway communities.
Without an official summary, it is hard to know what changes the bill actually makes. This makes it difficult to assess real costs or benefits. Stakeholders cannot fully evaluate the proposal.
The Agriculture Committee's involvement suggests the bill affects farming interests. Changes to land use rules might restrict agricultural activities. Farmers could face new regulations or reduced access.
Managing parks and lands requires funding. New rules or programs could increase government spending. Taxpayers might bear costs for park improvements or enforcement.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.