Latest action: Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H4088)
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Glenn Thompson (R-PA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires federal buildings to use mass timber in construction and renovation projects.
The problem
Federal buildings use traditional materials like steel and concrete. Mass timber is a renewable alternative that could reduce carbon emissions and support domestic forestry industries.
The proposal
The bill mandates federal agencies to prioritize mass timber in new federal building construction and major renovation projects when feasible and cost-effective.
The impact
Federal construction projects, timber industries, and building contractors will be affected. Taxpayers may see changes in federal building costs and environmental footprints.
Mass timber stores carbon and reduces reliance on carbon-intensive materials like concrete and steel. This could lower the federal government's construction-related carbon emissions.
Increased demand for mass timber would support American timber companies and forest management jobs. This creates economic activity in rural communities dependent on timber.
Federal projects using mass timber could demonstrate new construction techniques and encourage broader adoption across private and public sectors.
Mass timber comes from sustainably managed forests, promoting renewable resources over finite mineral-based materials in federal construction.
Mass timber may be more expensive than traditional materials in some regions. Taxpayers could face higher federal construction costs if this requirement increases prices.
Mass timber production capacity is currently limited in the United States. Mandatory federal use could strain supply and drive up prices for all buyers.
Mass timber is newer in large buildings, and some building codes need updates. Fire safety and durability in federal buildings require thorough testing.
Regions without timber industries cannot easily access mass timber materials. This could disadvantage federal building projects in areas far from timber sources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.