Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires employers to pay workers extra for working on federal holidays.
The problem
Workers often receive regular pay on federal holidays despite working. Some argue they should get premium pay for holiday work like they do for overtime.
The proposal
The bill would require employers to pay workers at a higher rate when they work on designated federal holidays, similar to overtime compensation rules.
The impact
Employees would earn more money on holidays. Employers would face higher labor costs. Businesses may adjust schedules or hiring practices in response.
Workers who must work on holidays would earn more money. This rewards people for sacrificing time with family and friends on important days. It recognizes the difficulty of holiday work.
Premium pay might push employers to avoid scheduling workers on holidays when possible. This could lead to more people getting holidays off to be with families.
Lower-wage workers often work holidays. Extra holiday pay helps reduce income gaps between holiday workers and others.
Employers would pay more to operate on holidays. Small businesses with tight budgets might struggle the most. This could reduce company profits.
Higher labor costs might cause employers to hire fewer workers or cut hours. Some businesses might close on holidays to avoid premium pay costs.
Businesses might raise prices to cover higher labor costs. Consumers could end up paying more at stores and restaurants on holidays.
Hospitals, police, and emergency services must staff holidays. This could strain budgets for critical public services that are already understaffed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.