Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires colleges to plan for mental health and suicide prevention on campuses.
The problem
College students face mental health challenges and suicide risk. Schools need better planning to prevent crises and support struggling students effectively.
The proposal
Bill directs colleges to develop comprehensive mental health and suicide prevention plans including staff training, resources, and crisis response procedures.
The impact
College students, administrators, and counselors affected. Schools must invest in mental health programs. Students gain better access to support services.
Better planning and prevention programs can reduce suicide rates on campuses. Early intervention through trained staff helps identify struggling students before crises occur.
Healthier students perform better academically and graduate at higher rates. Mental health resources help students stay in school and complete degrees.
Prevention is cheaper than dealing with emergencies or lawsuits. Schools save money by addressing problems early through counseling and support.
Coordinated plans create safer environments for all students. Clear procedures and trained responders help handle mental health emergencies effectively.
Colleges must hire staff, provide training, and build programs. Many schools struggle financially and may face budget challenges meeting requirements.
Without enforcement or funding, schools may create plans they don't follow. Requirements could become paperwork exercises without real improvements.
Mental health plans require tracking student information and screening. This raises questions about who accesses records and how data gets protected.
Well-funded colleges can afford better programs easily. Smaller or poorer schools struggle to meet standards, widening quality gaps.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.