Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute (Amended) by Voice Vote.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Establishes federal support for scaling up biology research and education programs.
The problem
The United States needs to expand biology research capacity and train more scientists to maintain competitiveness in biotechnology and life sciences innovation.
The proposal
Creates funding mechanisms and coordination frameworks for scaling biology research initiatives, infrastructure development, and workforce training programs across institutions.
The impact
Research institutions, students pursuing biology careers, and the biotechnology industry gain expanded funding and training opportunities.
Increased biology research funding helps the U.S. maintain leadership in biotechnology and life sciences. This supports innovation in medicine, agriculture, and other critical fields.
Expanded biology programs and workforce training prepare more Americans for high-paying STEM careers. Students gain access to better lab facilities and research experiences.
Investment in biology research drives innovation that creates biotech companies and jobs. Strong research infrastructure attracts private sector investment and partnerships.
Scaled biology research accelerates development of new treatments and medicines. This supports breakthroughs in disease prevention and patient care.
The bill requires significant federal funding that adds to government spending. Costs may concern lawmakers focused on reducing the deficit.
Without an official summary, the bill's specific funding levels and program requirements are unknown. This makes it difficult to assess true costs and effectiveness.
Benefits may concentrate at well-funded research institutions rather than distribute broadly. Rural and underserved areas might not see proportional gains.
Creating new coordination frameworks and programs adds bureaucratic requirements for schools and research centers. This increases administrative costs and complexity.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.