Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Gary Palmer (R-AL)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Addresses federal employee positions that remain unfilled or inactive for extended periods.
The problem
Some federal government positions stay vacant or inactive for years, potentially wasting resources and creating inefficiencies in government operations and service delivery.
The proposal
Establishes procedures to review, reassign, or eliminate federal positions that remain unfilled or inactive beyond specified timeframes to improve government efficiency.
The impact
Federal employees, government agencies, and citizens receiving federal services may face workforce changes, reorganization, and potential service adjustments.
Eliminating inactive positions could reduce waste and redirect resources to active operations. This may help government agencies work more effectively and serve the public better.
Removing unfilled positions from payroll could save federal funds. These savings might be reallocated to higher priorities or deficit reduction.
Cleaning up outdated or unused positions allows agencies to modernize their structure. This can improve organizational clarity and reduce confusion.
Federal employees could lose positions or face reassignment. Workers may experience job instability, income loss, and need to find new employment.
Eliminating positions without careful planning could reduce government capacity to serve the public. Some communities or services might face delays or reduced support.
Determining which positions are truly inactive versus strategically held requires careful analysis. Poor implementation could eliminate important positions by mistake.
Federal employees have protections and union agreements. Mass position eliminations could trigger legal disputes and labor conflicts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.