Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Increases awareness and prevention efforts for student suicide through education and screening programs.
The problem
Youth suicide rates remain high. Schools need better tools to identify at-risk students and help them access mental health support.
The proposal
The bill likely requires schools to provide suicide prevention training, implement screening programs, and increase access to mental health resources for students.
The impact
Students gain access to mental health support. Schools must adopt new prevention programs. Mental health providers may see increased referrals.
Early identification and intervention can prevent suicides. Awareness programs help students recognize warning signs in themselves and peers. This can lead to more students getting help before crisis situations occur.
School-based programs normalize mental health conversations. Students learn that mental health is as important as physical health. This encourages people to seek help without shame.
Schools reach most young people regularly. Universal screening ensures all students, even those without home support, get mental health support. This addresses equity gaps in mental health care access.
Prevention programs are cheaper than treating crises. Identifying at-risk students early reduces emergency room visits and hospitalizations. This saves money while improving outcomes.
Schools must fund training, screening tools, and mental health staff. Many schools already struggle with budgets. Without federal funding, schools may cut other programs.
Screening programs collect sensitive mental health information about minors. Parents may worry about data storage and sharing. Questions arise about who accesses student mental health records.
Teachers and staff need training to recognize warning signs and respond properly. This requires time and money. Some staff may feel unprepared despite training.
Broad screening may label some students as at-risk who are not. This can cause unnecessary worry for families. Overtreatment of low-risk students wastes resources.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.