Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Gary Peters (D-MI)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Fixes technical rules for U.S. Customs and Border Protection officer retirement benefits.
The problem
CBP officer retirement laws contain technical errors or outdated provisions that need correction to ensure proper administration of retirement benefits.
The proposal
The bill makes technical corrections to existing retirement rules and eligibility requirements for U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers.
The impact
CBP officers affected through clarified retirement rules. Taxpayers affected through accurate federal benefit payments. Agency operations streamlined.
Correcting technical problems in retirement law ensures the rules work as intended. This prevents confusion and disputes over benefits.
CBP officers receive accurate retirement benefits they earned. Clear rules protect officers from losing benefits due to legal mistakes.
Cleaner retirement rules reduce paperwork and administrative problems. This saves time and resources for CBP and federal agencies.
Technical corrections are generally noncontroversial fixes that both parties can support.
Without a detailed summary, the specific changes are unclear. Citizens cannot fully evaluate whether corrections are appropriate.
Technical corrections could accidentally alter benefits or eligibility in unexpected ways. This might affect some officers differently than intended.
The bill's fiscal impact is not specified. Changes to retirement benefits could increase federal spending.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.