Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 0.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Fixes technical errors in retirement rules for U.S. Customs and Border Protection officers.
The problem
Previous laws created mistakes or gaps in how CBP officer retirements work. These errors need fixing to apply rules correctly and fairly to officers.
The proposal
The bill corrects technical mistakes in CBP officer retirement benefits, eligibility rules, and payment calculations from earlier legislation.
The impact
CBP officers and their families benefit from corrected retirement rules. The government ensures consistent, accurate retirement payments and eligibility determinations.
Corrects mistakes in how CBP officers' retirement benefits were calculated or applied. This ensures officers receive the correct amount they earned and deserve.
Clarifies retirement rules so CBP officers know exactly what benefits they qualify for. This removes confusion about their retirement security and family protections.
Makes government systems consistent and easier to use. The technical fixes prevent future disputes over who qualifies for what benefits.
Ensures all officers are treated equally under the corrected rules. Technical errors that favored some officers over others get fixed.
No official summary explains exactly what technical errors are being fixed. The public cannot easily understand the specific changes being made.
Budget impact of the corrections is not explained in available information. Taxpayers don't know if this increases or decreases government spending.
It's unclear if corrections apply to past retirements or only future ones. This could affect which officers receive adjustments to their benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.