Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
James Comer (R-KY)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Stops the government from making incorrect or fraudulent payments to people.
The problem
Federal agencies waste money by sending payments to wrong people or paying false claims. This costs taxpayers billions annually and enables fraud schemes.
The proposal
Creates new tools and requirements for federal agencies to verify recipients before paying out money. Agencies must check if payments are legitimate.
The impact
Taxpayers save money, federal agencies improve spending accuracy, and fraudsters face harder barriers. Legitimate benefit recipients may face delays.
Prevents billions in improper payments from leaving the government. Legitimate uses of tax dollars increase when fraud decreases. Saves money for other government services.
Makes it harder for scammers to steal from federal programs. Increases consequences for people submitting false claims. Protects honest citizens from criminals exploiting the system.
Agencies develop better systems to track and verify payments. Creates stronger internal controls across federal programs. Reduces administrative burden from fixing payment errors.
Extra verification steps could delay payments to eligible people needing help. Vulnerable populations might wait longer for critical assistance. More bureaucracy means more processing time.
Requires investment in new technology and verification systems. Agencies need training and additional staff for checks. Initial spending may be substantial before savings appear.
More data sharing between agencies could expose personal information. Citizens must provide more details for verification. Raises questions about government data security.
Overly strict verification could wrongly deny benefits to qualified applicants. People without proper documentation face challenges accessing support. Could harm homeless or disadvantaged populations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.