Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary. (Sponsor introductory remarks on measure: CR S2417-2418; text: CR S2418)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill would eliminate the federal death penalty as a punishment for crimes.
The problem
The federal government currently can impose death sentences for certain crimes. Supporters argue this punishment is applied unfairly and ineffective at preventing crime.
The proposal
The bill would prohibit the federal death penalty, preventing courts from sentencing anyone to death for federal crimes.
The impact
Federal death row inmates, federal courts, crime victims' families, and states with federal prosecutions would be affected by removal of this sentencing option.
Death penalty cases have resulted in exonerations when evidence later proved innocence. Eliminating capital punishment removes the risk of executing innocent people.
Research shows race and income affect who receives death sentences. Eliminating the death penalty removes this source of potential unfairness in the justice system.
Death penalty cases are expensive due to lengthy appeals and special procedures. Ending it could reduce federal criminal justice spending.
Most developed nations have abolished capital punishment. This change would bring federal law closer to international norms.
Some crime victims' families view the death penalty as appropriate justice. Eliminating it removes this sentencing option they may support.
The death penalty serves as the most severe punishment available. Removing it limits sentencing options for the most serious federal crimes.
Some argue the possibility of execution deters potential offenders from committing the worst crimes. Eliminating it could reduce this deterrent impact.
Dozens of people currently face federal death sentences. The bill's handling of existing cases could require significant legal decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.