Latest action: Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by the Yeas and Nays: 25 - 19.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Prevents fraud in durable medical equipment sales and billing.
The problem
Criminals fraudulently bill Medicare and insurance companies for medical equipment like wheelchairs and oxygen tanks that patients never receive or need.
The proposal
Creates new rules and penalties to catch fake DME claims, requires better verification of patient needs, and increases oversight of DME suppliers.
The impact
Medicare, insurance companies, and DME suppliers face stricter requirements. Patients get better protection against unnecessary equipment charges.
Prevents fraudsters from stealing millions in Medicare and Medicaid funds through fake medical equipment claims. Reduces waste in government healthcare spending.
Stops patients from being billed for equipment they don't actually need or receive. Reduces confusion and fraud targeting vulnerable seniors.
Gives prosecutors and investigators better tools and clearer penalties to punish DME fraud schemes. Makes it easier to catch and prosecute criminals.
Requires better verification that patients actually need equipment before suppliers are paid. Ensures legitimate patients get genuine assistance.
Small medical equipment companies face expensive new paperwork and verification requirements. May increase compliance costs and reduce competition in rural areas.
Stricter approval rules could delay seniors from getting needed wheelchairs, oxygen, or other equipment. May create bureaucratic barriers for legitimate claims.
New verification rules may require collecting more personal health information from patients. Could raise data security and privacy risks.
Bill lacks specific details on how rules will work in practice. Could lead to confusion about what suppliers and doctors must do.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.