Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to help children develop independence and resilience through policy changes.
The problem
Children may lack opportunities to develop independence and resilience skills needed for healthy development and self-sufficiency in adulthood.
The proposal
Modifies government policies and programs to encourage childhood independence and resilience-building activities and educational practices.
The impact
Children, parents, schools, and social service programs affected by changes to support independence development and resilience training.
Promotes independence and resilience in children, which helps them become more confident and capable adults. These skills help kids handle challenges and solve problems on their own. Strong resilience supports better mental health outcomes.
Children who develop independence skills may need less government support as adults. This could lower long-term costs for social services and welfare programs. Stronger self-reliance benefits both individuals and public budgets.
Educational research shows independence and resilience training improve academic performance and social development. Children gain confidence, improved decision-making skills, and better peer relationships. These benefits last into adulthood.
Most parents want their children to become independent and capable. Policy supporting these goals reflects common values across communities. Programs can reinforce what families already try to teach.
Creating new programs and training teachers requires significant funding. Government agencies need resources to coordinate policies across departments. Costs may increase before any savings appear.
Emphasis on independence could limit necessary oversight and protection of vulnerable children. Some safeguards might be reduced if independence is pushed too far. Balance between independence and protection is critical.
Children in wealthier areas may benefit more from independence programs than those in struggling communities. Access to quality programs depends on school funding and resources. Some children could be left behind.
Some parents may worry about reduced supervision or support for their children. Different families have different comfort levels with independence practices. One-size-fits-all policies may not work for all communities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.