Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, and in addition to the Committee on Natural Resources, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Authorizes federal efforts to eradicate and control golden mussels from U.S. waterways.
The problem
Golden mussels are invasive species that clog water pipes, damage infrastructure, and harm native ecosystems in American lakes and rivers.
The proposal
The bill establishes federal programs and funding to detect, remove, and prevent golden mussels from spreading to uninfected water systems.
The impact
Water utilities, recreational users, farmers, and ecosystems benefit from prevention of mussel damage to infrastructure and natural habitats.
Golden mussels clog pipes and damage pumps at water treatment plants. Federal coordination prevents costly repairs and service disruptions for millions of Americans relying on clean water.
Early prevention and control costs less than dealing with widespread infestations later. States and municipalities benefit from shared federal resources rather than bearing costs alone.
Golden mussels outcompete native species and disrupt aquatic food chains. Controlling them preserves fishing, boating, and natural habitats people depend on.
Invasive species don't respect state borders. Federal coordination ensures consistent detection and prevention across waterways shared by multiple states.
New eradication and control programs require federal funding. Critics argue this adds to government spending and national debt during budget constraints.
Golden mussels are difficult to eliminate once established. Funding may not guarantee success, potentially wasting resources on ineffective programs.
Some argue states already manage water resources effectively. Federal involvement may duplicate efforts or reduce state flexibility in managing their own waters.
Without an official summary, the specific funding amounts, enforcement mechanisms, and program scope remain unclear, making full assessment difficult.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.