Latest action: Subcommittee Hearings Held
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Jimmy Panetta (D-CA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Study whether to establish a historic military site at Monterey.
The problem
Monterey has significant military history that may not be properly recognized or preserved for public education and understanding.
The proposal
The bill directs a study to examine Monterey's military importance and determine if it should become an official historic military site.
The impact
Federal agencies, local communities, and history enthusiasts would be affected through potential site designation and associated preservation or tourism changes.
A study could document important military heritage at Monterey for future generations. This ensures significant historical events and locations are not forgotten or lost.
Historic site designation could attract more visitors to Monterey. This could increase spending at local businesses and create economic benefits for the community.
An official site could educate the public about military history through visitor centers and programs. This strengthens civic understanding of America's past.
A study is relatively inexpensive compared to actual site construction or management. It allows informed decision-making before any major spending occurs.
If the study recommends designation, ongoing federal funding for maintenance and operations could be required. Long-term budget impact remains unknown.
Historic site designation could restrict how property owners use their land. This might burden local landowners or limit development opportunities.
After completing the study, Congress may not fund actual site development. Resources spent on the study could be viewed as wasteful if no implementation follows.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.