Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Study whether to create a national historic trail following George Washington's 1753 route.
The problem
No formal study exists on establishing a historic trail commemorating George Washington's 1753 expedition through Virginia and Pennsylvania.
The proposal
Congress directs the National Park Service to study the feasibility of designating Washington's Trail as a National Historic Trail.
The impact
Historians, tourism boards, and communities along the potential trail route would be affected. The study may lead to trail development, economic benefits, and educational opportunities.
A national historic trail could attract visitors to rural communities along the route. This would create jobs and revenue for local businesses like hotels, restaurants, and gift shops.
The 1753 expedition was significant to colonial America. A formal trail would protect historic sites and educate future generations about this important period.
A national historic trail provides hiking, walking, and educational activities. Families and history enthusiasts would have new places to visit and explore.
A feasibility study is inexpensive compared to actual trail construction. It helps determine if the project is worthwhile before major investment.
The National Park Service must conduct the study, requiring staff time and funding. This takes resources away from other conservation and educational priorities.
If the study succeeds, the trail could require significant funding for building, maintenance, and staff. Long-term costs could be substantial.
Much of the 1753 route likely crosses private property. Getting permission or purchasing land easements could be difficult and costly.
The trail primarily serves historical interest and tourism. It may not address more urgent national needs like infrastructure repair or conservation of threatened ecosystems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1622
Expressing support for the preservation, protection, and maintenance of statues and monuments honoring Christopher Columbus as an enduring testament to the Nation's history, heritage, and identity.
HR 10669
LANDs Act
SRES 935
A resolution designating October 23, 2026, as "National Marine Sanctuary Day".
S 5608
Secure Rural Schools Reauthorization Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.