Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 586.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Juan Ciscomani (R-AZ)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires schools to give equal access to facilities for student groups and community organizations.
The problem
Some schools may limit which student clubs or community groups can use school buildings, creating unequal treatment and limiting student opportunities.
The proposal
Schools must provide fair and equal access to facilities for all student organizations and qualified community groups without discrimination.
The impact
Student clubs, community organizations, and schools must follow new facility-sharing rules. Schools may need to manage scheduling differently.
All student clubs get equal chances to use school spaces. This prevents schools from favoring some groups over others. Students have more opportunities to meet and organize.
Community groups can use school buildings for meetings and events. This strengthens connections between schools and neighborhoods. More people can access public spaces.
Students and groups cannot be blocked from facilities based on their views. This encourages open discussion and debate. Protected speech rights expand in schools.
Prevents discrimination based on religion, politics, or other factors. All groups follow the same rules. Fairness improves across schools.
Schools must create new scheduling systems and policies. Staff time increases managing facility requests. Small schools may struggle with complexity.
Schools may be required to allow groups they cannot monitor closely. Liability and safety risks could increase. Schools might face legal challenges.
More groups using buildings means more maintenance needed. Cleaning and repair costs may rise. Schools with tight budgets face challenges.
More groups requesting facilities creates scheduling conflicts. Some groups may feel their needs are ignored. Schools face difficult decisions about priority.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.