Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill requires schools to teach students about artificial intelligence and prepare them for AI-related careers.
The problem
Students lack understanding of AI technology and skills needed for future jobs. Schools need guidance on teaching AI concepts to all grade levels.
The proposal
Bill establishes AI literacy programs in K-12 schools. Provides funding, teacher training, and curriculum standards for teaching AI basics and skills.
The impact
Students gain AI knowledge. Teachers need training. Schools receive funding. Students better prepared for future careers involving technology.
AI skills are increasingly demanded in the job market. Teaching students early helps them compete for well-paying careers. Schools help students understand technology they will use their whole lives.
Low-income students often have less access to tech education. This bill helps all students learn, regardless of family income. Increases fairness in educational opportunity.
Countries teaching AI literacy produce workers for advanced industries. U.S. students stay competitive globally. Supports long-term economic strength.
Bill includes funding for teacher training on AI topics. Teachers gain new skills and professional opportunities. Improves overall teacher quality.
Training teachers and developing curriculum requires significant funding. School budgets are already tight. Money spent here might reduce funding for other programs.
Few teachers have AI expertise or training. Finding qualified trainers is difficult. Training programs take time to develop.
Bill provides limited detail on what AI literacy means for different grades. Schools may struggle defining what to teach. Different districts may teach very different content.
AI education often requires computers and technology. More screen time in schools worries some parents. May not suit all learning styles.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.