Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Removes Kansas state jurisdiction over crimes involving Native Americans on tribal lands.
The problem
Kansas currently has legal authority over crimes committed by or against Native Americans on tribal lands in Kansas, which may conflict with tribal sovereignty and federal Indian law principles.
The proposal
Repeals section 3243 of title 18 of U.S. Code, eliminating Kansas state criminal jurisdiction over offenses on tribal lands involving Native Americans.
The impact
Native Americans on Kansas tribal lands, tribal governments, Kansas law enforcement, and the federal court system. Changes how crimes are prosecuted in these areas.
Allows tribal nations to exercise greater control over their own judicial systems and law enforcement. Respects tribal governments' right to govern their communities and handle their own legal matters.
Brings Kansas law into alignment with established federal Indian law principles that generally recognize tribal jurisdiction over tribal lands. Reduces legal conflicts between state and tribal authority.
Eliminates confusion and overlap when both Kansas and tribal courts claim authority. Creates clearer legal pathways for cases involving Native Americans on tribal lands.
Allows tribal courts to develop and strengthen their own legal institutions. Promotes self-determination and community-based justice approaches.
Kansas law enforcement loses direct jurisdiction, which could delay responses to crimes or create coordination problems. Non-tribal residents on tribal lands may face unclear legal accountability.
Not all tribal courts have equal resources or developed legal systems to handle all types of cases. Some tribes may struggle with serious crimes or complex prosecutions.
Kansas loses ability to prosecute crimes within its borders, even though the state has law enforcement capacity. May reduce Kansas' ability to protect non-Native residents in these areas.
Bill provides no details on handling existing cases or how jurisdiction transfers. Could create legal confusion during the change-over period.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.