Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires federal audits of state programs that receive federal funding to ensure accountability.
The problem
Federal funds go to state-run programs, but oversight may be unclear. Questions arise about how states use federal money and whether it's tracked properly.
The proposal
The bill creates audit requirements for federally funded programs run by states. It establishes clearer oversight rules and accountability measures for how states spend federal money.
The impact
States must follow new audit rules. Federal agencies gain clearer oversight. Taxpayers get better tracking of federal spending. Program administrators face increased reporting requirements.
Clear audits show exactly how federal funds are spent. Taxpayers can see where their money goes. This reduces waste and confusion about federal spending.
States must document how they use federal money. This makes it harder to misuse funds. Programs must meet federal standards and rules.
Regular audits find errors and issues quickly. This prevents small problems from becoming big ones. Mistakes can be corrected faster.
All states follow the same audit rules. This makes comparing programs across states easier. Federal oversight becomes consistent nationwide.
States must hire auditors and staff to follow new rules. Existing programs may lose funding for these administrative costs. Smaller states may struggle with expenses.
More audits and paperwork take time. States may delay spending federal money while completing audits. Program services to people might be delayed.
States have less freedom to run programs their own way. Federal rules may not fit local needs. States lose some control over their own operations.
Audits may require sharing detailed program data. Individual information could be exposed. Privacy protections may be harder to maintain.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.