Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve celiac disease safety standards and food labeling requirements.
The problem
People with celiac disease need better protection from unsafe food. Current labeling and safety rules may not prevent harmful cross-contamination in food production.
The proposal
The bill likely establishes stricter labeling rules, safety standards, and testing requirements for gluten-free food products to protect celiac disease patients.
The impact
Celiac disease patients gain safer food options. Food manufacturers must follow new rules. Consumers may see clearer product labels about gluten content.
Stricter safety standards reduce the risk of accidental gluten exposure. This helps people with celiac disease eat safely without getting sick from hidden gluten in food products.
Better labeling helps consumers quickly identify safe products. People with celiac disease spend less time reading ingredients and checking if food is truly gluten-free.
Clear standards help honest companies compete fairly. Companies that follow safety rules gain consumer trust and market advantage over those with weaker safety practices.
Fewer accidental gluten exposures mean fewer hospital visits and doctor appointments. This saves money for patients and the healthcare system overall.
New safety standards and testing requirements cost money to implement. Small food manufacturers may struggle more than large companies to afford these upgrades.
Companies may pass compliance costs to consumers through higher prices. This affects all shoppers, not just those with celiac disease.
Small manufacturers may find new rules too expensive or complicated to follow. Some may exit the gluten-free market, reducing product choices.
New regulations require oversight and enforcement. This creates additional government spending and paperwork for food companies and agencies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.