Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
This bill protects Americans' privacy by limiting how the U.S. Postal Service collects and shares personal data.
The problem
The Postal Service collects large amounts of customer data. There are concerns about how this data is used, stored, and potentially shared with other government agencies or third parties.
The proposal
The bill would establish rules for the Postal Service on collecting, storing, and using personal information. It requires transparency and limits data sharing without customer permission.
The impact
Postal customers would gain privacy protections. The Postal Service would face new compliance requirements. Law enforcement and other agencies may have limited access to postal data.
Americans would have clearer control over their personal information held by the Postal Service. The bill would limit how the government uses mail data without explicit permission from customers.
The Postal Service would be required to clearly explain what data it collects and how it uses that data. Customers would know when their information is accessed or shared.
The bill sets guardrails against the Postal Service selling or sharing customer information with private companies or other agencies without consent. This reduces risks of identity theft and unwanted targeting.
Police and federal agents sometimes use mail data to investigate crimes. Strict privacy rules could make it harder for law enforcement to pursue suspects or prevent criminal activity.
The Postal Service would need to spend money on new systems and staff to follow the new privacy rules. These costs could affect the agency's budget or service quality.
Privacy restrictions on data use could make it harder for the Postal Service to improve delivery routes or predict demand. This might slightly reduce operational efficiency.
Without an official summary, the full scope of rules and exceptions is unknown. Vague language could create confusion about how the law applies in specific situations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.