Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to establish community policing programs and improve police-community relationships nationwide.
The problem
Many communities experience tension between police and residents. Better communication and trust-building between officers and neighborhoods could reduce conflict.
The proposal
Creates federal grants and programs to support community policing initiatives. Funds training, local partnerships, and strategies for police-community engagement.
The impact
Police departments, communities, and federal agencies. Affects funding for law enforcement training and local crime prevention partnerships.
Community policing can help build relationships between officers and residents. When police and communities work together, people may trust law enforcement more and report crimes more readily.
Grants help smaller police departments afford community programs they couldn't fund alone. This spreads proven policing strategies across different cities and regions.
Community involvement can help prevent crimes before they happen. When residents and police communicate, they can identify problems and solve them together.
Funding for training helps officers learn better communication and de-escalation skills. Well-trained officers may handle situations more safely and effectively.
New grant programs require federal funding, increasing government spending. This money comes from taxes and adds to the national budget.
Community policing requires sustained effort and resources to work well. Some departments may struggle to maintain programs long-term or apply them effectively.
Results of community policing programs vary by location and circumstances. It's unclear whether federal funding will guarantee improved outcomes in all communities.
Different communities have different needs and cultures. A federal program may not address unique local situations effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.