Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal grants for telehealth networks and resource centers.
The problem
Existing telehealth grant programs are expiring or lack updated authorization. Healthcare providers need continued federal support for remote care infrastructure.
The proposal
Bill extends and reauthorizes telehealth network and telehealth resource center grant programs under the Public Health Service Act.
The impact
Rural and underserved communities, healthcare providers, and patients using telehealth services benefit from continued federal funding and support.
Telehealth networks help people in remote areas access doctors and specialists without traveling long distances. Continued funding ensures these services stay available in underserved communities.
Telehealth visits are often cheaper than in-person appointments. Supporting these programs helps patients and the healthcare system save money.
Resource centers help train doctors and nurses in telehealth technology and best practices. This improves the quality of remote care nationwide.
Reauthorization ensures telehealth systems already in place continue operating without interruption. Communities won't lose services they depend on.
Reauthorizing grants requires ongoing federal funding. Critics may argue these funds could be directed elsewhere or that programs should be self-sustaining.
Heavy government support might reduce incentives for private companies to invest in telehealth. Market-based solutions could be crowded out.
Without an official summary, the exact scope, funding amounts, and specific requirements remain unclear. This makes full evaluation difficult.
Grant funding may not reach all underserved areas equally. Rural areas in some states might benefit more than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.