Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Transportation and Infrastructure, and Financial Services, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to penalize cities that limit cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.
The problem
Some cities have policies restricting local police from helping federal immigration agents. Supporters argue this hinders immigration enforcement and public safety efforts.
The proposal
The bill would reduce federal funding to cities with sanctuary policies and require local law enforcement to cooperate with federal immigration authorities.
The impact
Cities with sanctuary policies, local police departments, immigrants, and federal agencies would face changes. Funding and enforcement practices could shift significantly.
Supporters argue the bill ensures federal immigration laws are enforced uniformly across the country. It removes barriers that prevent local police from assisting federal immigration officers, potentially improving enforcement coordination.
Backers contend that cities receiving federal funds should comply with federal law. The bill creates consequences for policies they view as obstructing federal authority.
Proponents claim that cooperation between local and federal authorities improves public safety. They argue sanctuary policies create gaps that endanger communities.
Critics argue cities should set their own policing priorities without federal pressure. Forcing local police cooperation with immigration enforcement changes local control over police practices.
Opponents worry that immigrants will avoid reporting crimes if police cooperate with immigration authorities. This could undermine community policing and reduce crime reporting overall.
Reducing federal funding to cities would harm public services like transportation, infrastructure, and public safety programs. Poorer cities would be hit hardest by budget cuts.
Legal experts question whether the federal government can force local police to enforce federal immigration law. Some view this as overreach of federal authority.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
HR 10656
Nicholas Douglas Quets Border Travel Safety Act
S 5521
Ukrainian Adjustment Act of 2026
S 5490
A bill to designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.