Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents misuse of subpoenas in legal cases by imposing restrictions and penalties.
The problem
Subpoenas may be misused to harass, intimidate, or burden people with excessive legal demands unrelated to legitimate cases.
The proposal
Establishes rules limiting subpoena use, requires justification for broad requests, and creates penalties for abusive subpoena practices.
The impact
Affects courts, lawyers, businesses, and individuals by changing how legal documents can be requested and setting new compliance standards.
Prevents people from being overwhelmed by unnecessary subpoenas used as a harassment tactic. Gives courts power to stop abusive legal tactics before they harm innocent people.
Cuts down frivolous subpoena requests that waste court time and resources. Allows courts to focus on legitimate cases instead of managing abuse.
Limits fishing expeditions into personal or business records unrelated to actual disputes. Ensures sensitive information stays private unless truly necessary.
Saves companies money by preventing expensive compliance with excessive document requests. Reduces legal burden on small businesses especially.
Attorneys need broad subpoena power to uncover evidence in legitimate cases. New restrictions could make it harder to find important facts.
Bill details are unknown, so penalties and how rules apply might be unclear. Courts could struggle with inconsistent application of new standards.
Lawyers and courts must learn and follow new subpoena rules. Increases time and cost to resolve disputes with additional compliance steps.
People suing large corporations might need broad subpoena access to find evidence. New limits could make it harder for average people to get records from big companies.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.