Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to prevent future violence through intervention and risk assessment programs.
The problem
Rising concerns about preventing violent crimes before they occur. Current systems may lack coordinated early intervention strategies.
The proposal
Establishes programs to identify individuals at risk of committing violence and provide intervention services to reduce harm.
The impact
Law enforcement, mental health providers, and at-risk individuals affected. May increase funding for prevention programs and interventions.
Early intervention programs can identify warning signs and provide help before violence occurs. This approach has shown success in reducing violent incidents in some communities.
The bill likely funds mental health treatment and counseling. This addresses root causes of violent behavior and helps individuals get needed care.
Reducing violence makes communities safer for residents. Prevention is often cheaper than dealing with crime after it happens.
New intervention programs require staff, counselors, and coordinators. This creates employment in social services and law enforcement.
Identifying at-risk individuals requires collecting personal data. Critics worry this could violate privacy rights or unfairly target certain groups.
It's hard to know if prevention programs actually work. The bill lacks details on how success will be measured.
Funding new programs requires significant taxpayer money. The bill details are unclear on total costs and budget sources.
Risk assessment tools can unfairly target minority groups or poor communities. This could worsen existing inequalities in the justice system.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.