Latest action: Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Oversight and Government Reform, Ways and Means, and House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects vote-by-mail systems and expands mail voting access across the United States.
The problem
Some states have limited mail voting options. Questions exist about mail voting security, accessibility, and consistency across different states.
The proposal
The bill would establish federal standards for mail voting, likely expanding access and setting security requirements for how states handle mail ballots.
The impact
Voters gain more mail voting options. States must follow new federal rules. Election officials need new procedures and resources.
More people could vote by mail, including those with disabilities, work conflicts, or transportation issues. This could increase voter participation across the country.
Federal standards would make mail voting rules the same across states. This could reduce confusion and ensure fair treatment of all voters nationwide.
Mail voting allows people to vote from home at their own pace. This removes barriers for elderly voters, rural voters, and busy workers.
The bill likely includes security measures for mail ballots. This could improve public confidence in election results and ballot integrity.
States have traditionally controlled their own elections. New federal rules could limit state flexibility to design voting systems that fit their needs.
States need money and training to set up new mail voting systems and procedures. This creates budget pressures for election offices.
Some people worry mail voting is less secure than in-person voting. The bill may not fully address these concerns for skeptical voters.
Handling millions of mail ballots requires proper postal coordination and tracking. Errors in delivery or processing could cause problems.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.