Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committees on Education and Workforce, Ways and Means, the Judiciary, House Administration, and Oversight and Government Reform, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to improve workforce in long-term care facilities through support programs and funding.
The problem
Long-term care facilities face severe staffing shortages affecting quality of patient care. Workers lack training, competitive pay, and career advancement opportunities.
The proposal
Establishes workforce development programs, training grants, and incentives for long-term care workers. Addresses recruitment, retention, and professional development in the sector.
The impact
Long-term care workers, elderly patients, facilities, and healthcare system gain support. Families relying on care services may experience improved quality and availability.
More trained and stable staff leads to higher quality care for elderly and disabled residents. Staffing shortages directly impact patient safety and outcomes in care facilities.
Creates new job opportunities and career pathways in long-term care sector. Training programs help workers gain skills and advance professionally.
Targeted solutions for severe staffing problems in care facilities across the nation. Support programs make careers in long-term care more attractive and sustainable.
Strengthens a critical sector of the healthcare industry. Can reduce costly turnover and emergency staffing issues.
New programs and grants require federal funding during tight budget periods. Costs may grow beyond initial projections over time.
Complex multi-committee coordination needed for implementation. May face delays or inconsistent execution across different states and facilities.
Without official summary, specific program details and funding levels are unknown. Difficult to assess exact effectiveness before implementation.
New requirements and oversight could create administrative costs for facilities. Small facilities may struggle more than large chains with compliance.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.