Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 582.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Glenn Thompson (R-PA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill creates oversight and accountability measures to prevent fraud in student financial aid programs.
The problem
Student aid fraud costs taxpayers money and undermines program integrity. Better enforcement mechanisms are needed to detect and prevent fraudulent aid claims.
The proposal
Establishes oversight procedures, accountability requirements, and enforcement mechanisms to combat student aid fraud and protect federal education funding.
The impact
Affects students receiving aid, schools administering programs, federal agencies, and taxpayers paying for education assistance programs.
Reducing fraud means less wasted federal spending. Stronger enforcement helps ensure aid reaches eligible students only. This protects the overall sustainability of student aid programs.
Better fraud detection protects honest students by preserving program resources. It ensures aid availability for those who truly need it. Reduces unfair competition for limited funding.
Creates clear accountability standards for schools and administrators. Strengthens oversight mechanisms across the student aid system. Increases public confidence in education programs.
Enhanced enforcement tools help identify people committing fraud. Penalties and consequences deter future fraud attempts. Creates consequences for institutions that enable fraud.
New oversight requires funding for additional staff and systems. Schools must implement new compliance procedures. These costs may increase tuition or reduce other educational spending.
Stricter verification procedures could delay students receiving aid. More bureaucracy means longer waiting times. This could harm students who need money quickly.
Increased oversight may require collecting more personal information. Data sharing between agencies raises privacy questions. Risk of information misuse or breaches.
Schools may face heavy paperwork and reporting requirements. Smaller institutions may struggle with new rules. Could divert resources from actual teaching and student services.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.