Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents federal education funding from going to students who don't actually exist or aren't enrolled.
The problem
Schools may receive federal aid for students not genuinely enrolled or 'ghost students' who don't attend. This wastes taxpayer money and inflates school funding numbers.
The proposal
Requires schools to verify student enrollment before receiving federal education funds. Creates accountability measures to prevent payments for nonexistent or inactive students.
The impact
Schools must implement stricter enrollment verification. Students and families may face more documentation requirements. Federal education funding distribution becomes more accountable.
Schools must prove enrollment to receive funding. Creates clearer tracking of where federal education money actually goes.
Prevents federal money from paying for students who don't actually attend school. Ensures education dollars go to real students getting real instruction.
Verification requirements help identify schools falsifying enrollment numbers. Can catch dishonest practices that harm the education system.
Funding reflects actual student attendance and needs. Schools serving real students get appropriate federal support.
Schools must spend time and money verifying every student's enrollment. Small rural schools may struggle with extra paperwork requirements.
Strict verification could slow school registration for new students. Families might face extra hoops before students officially start school.
The bill text is not available, so specific requirements are unclear. Rules could be overly strict or affect legitimate students inadvertently.
Homeless or transient students may struggle with documentation requirements. Verification systems could accidentally exclude students who need help most.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.