Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates wellness and peer support programs for police officers to improve mental health.
The problem
Police officers face high stress, trauma, and mental health challenges. Many lack access to confidential support resources without career consequences.
The proposal
Establishes peer support programs, mental health resources, and confidential counseling services specifically for law enforcement officers and their families.
The impact
Police officers and their families gain mental health support. Departments get resources to implement wellness programs. Taxpayers fund new federal initiatives.
Peer support and counseling help officers handle trauma and stress better. This can reduce officer burnout and improve overall wellbeing. Support may help officers stay healthy and productive.
Officers with better mental health may make better decisions on the job. They may handle situations more effectively and safely. This protects both officers and the public.
Dedicated wellness programs normalize getting help. Officers may feel safer seeking support without fearing job loss. This encourages early help-seeking behavior.
Family members also get access to counseling and resources. This helps entire households cope with the stress of police work. Family support improves home stability.
New programs require taxpayer funding. The bill likely costs federal money to implement nationwide. Congress would need to budget for ongoing costs.
Departments vary in size and resources. Small departments may struggle to use new programs effectively. Uneven rollout could create gaps in coverage.
The bill only covers law enforcement officers. Other high-stress professions like teachers, EMTs, and firefighters are excluded. This may seem unfair to other workers.
Peer support records could potentially be accessed by departments or courts. Officers may still fear that seeking help could harm careers or cases. Strong confidentiality protections may be difficult to enforce.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.