Latest action: Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 28.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Finalizes land ownership rights for the Cape Fox Corporation in Alaska.
The problem
Cape Fox Corporation, an Alaska Native village corporation, needs final resolution of land entitlements under federal law to clarify property rights and complete historical land settlement obligations.
The proposal
The bill completes the land entitlement process for Cape Fox Corporation by finalizing which federal lands they receive as part of Alaska Native settlement agreements.
The impact
Cape Fox Corporation and its shareholders gain clear land ownership. Local communities in Alaska and federal land managers receive final clarity on land boundaries and ownership responsibilities.
Finalizing land entitlements ends decades of ambiguity about land ownership. This allows Cape Fox Corporation to make long-term economic and development plans. Clear property rights benefit both the corporation and surrounding communities.
Land ownership enables Cape Fox Corporation to pursue business opportunities and resource development. This can create jobs and economic benefits for Alaska Native shareholders.
The bill completes commitments made in Alaska Native settlement agreements from decades ago. Finalizing these obligations demonstrates government accountability to Native communities.
Federal agencies, tribes, and the corporation gain clear understanding of who manages each land area. This prevents future disputes and reduces administrative confusion.
No official summary exists, making it difficult to assess specific land transfers or potential impacts. Citizens cannot easily understand what lands are affected or why.
Transferring federal lands to private ownership may reduce government environmental protections. Development on newly-owned lands could impact wildlife, forests, or waterways.
The bill may involve federal land transfers or administrative costs not yet disclosed. Taxpayers lack information about government expenses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.