Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects workers and communities of color from harmful chemicals in cosmetic and beauty products.
The problem
Beauty and cosmetic products, especially those marketed to communities of color and used in professional salons, may contain dangerous chemicals linked to health problems. Workers face daily exposure with limited protections.
The proposal
Requires stronger safety standards for cosmetic products, increases regulation of chemical ingredients, and protects professional salon workers through workplace safety requirements and training.
The impact
Cosmetic companies must reformulate products; salon workers gain safety protections; consumers get safer products; communities of color reduce exposure to potentially harmful chemicals.
Salon workers, many from communities of color, face daily chemical exposure. This bill requires safety standards and training to reduce respiratory problems, skin issues, and long-term health damage from handling beauty products.
Some cosmetics marketed to Black and Hispanic consumers contain higher levels of harmful chemicals like lead and phthalates. This bill targets those specific products to reduce health inequities.
Stricter ingredient regulations mean people know what chemicals are in products they use on their skin and hair. Better labeling helps consumers make informed choices about their health.
Professional salons get clear safety rules, ventilation requirements, and worker training programs. This creates safer working conditions for thousands of beauty professionals.
Salon owners and cosmetic companies must pay for reformulation, testing, and compliance. Small businesses may struggle with these costs more than large corporations, potentially raising prices for consumers.
Some manufacturers might stop making certain products rather than reformulate them. Consumers could lose access to cultural or specialty products if companies find compliance too expensive.
The government must hire inspectors and build new testing systems to enforce new rules. This requires significant funding and resources to work effectively.
The bill lacks specific details on which chemicals are banned, transition timelines, and exact safety standards. Vague rules create confusion for companies trying to comply.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.