Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires cosmetic companies to disclose their supply chain sources and practices.
The problem
Consumers lack information about where cosmetics come from and how they're made. Supply chain problems like unsafe ingredients or unethical labor may go undetected.
The proposal
The bill would require cosmetic manufacturers to report details about their suppliers, ingredients, and production practices to a federal agency.
The impact
Cosmetic companies must track and report supply chain information. Consumers get more product information. Regulatory agencies gain oversight of the industry.
People can learn more about what's in their cosmetics and where products come from. This helps consumers make informed choices about the products they use on their bodies.
Transparency makes it harder for companies to hide unsafe ingredients or unfair labor practices. Government agencies can identify and stop problems more easily.
Companies with honest practices get recognized. This rewards businesses doing the right thing instead of letting dishonest competitors gain unfair advantages.
Health agencies can track cosmetic ingredients and safety trends across the industry. This helps prevent widespread problems before they affect many people.
Companies must spend money to track and report supply chain information. Small cosmetic businesses might struggle more with these new requirements than large corporations.
Reporting detailed supply chain information could reveal trade secrets to competitors. Companies might worry about losing their competitive advantages.
Companies need to understand what information to report and how to report it. Unclear rules could lead to confusion and unintended violations.
Government agencies must have resources to review and enforce supply chain reports. Without enough staff, the transparency requirement might not work effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.