Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 552.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Brad Finstad (R-MN)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires federal agencies to provide evidence supporting their policies and regulations.
The problem
Federal agencies create rules and policies without always showing clear proof these actions work as intended or benefit the public.
The proposal
The bill requires government agencies to document and prove their policies actually achieve stated goals before or after implementation.
The impact
Federal agencies must justify regulations with evidence. Businesses face clearer rules. Citizens may see fewer untested government actions.
Agencies must show evidence their rules actually work. This makes government more transparent and helps the public understand why policies exist. Citizens can better evaluate if government is doing its job.
Requiring proof before implementing rules means policies are more likely to succeed. Bad ideas get caught early instead of wasting time and money on ineffective programs.
Agencies may eliminate unnecessary or ineffective rules. This could reduce compliance costs for businesses and lower administrative burdens.
Congress and the public can make better decisions when they see evidence. It encourages government to use science and data rather than assumptions.
Requiring proof before action takes time and delays responses to urgent problems. Agencies might move slowly when speed matters, like during emergencies or crises.
Some policy goals are hard to measure with proof. Social or ethical goals may not produce clear evidence, making compliance complicated and expensive.
Agencies spend money collecting and analyzing evidence instead of running programs. This could strain budgets and reduce resources for actual services.
The bill could create disputes over what counts as acceptable evidence. Companies and activists might sue more often, leading to costly court battles.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.