Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows Special Operations Forces members to carry concealed weapons nationwide.
The problem
Special Operations Forces personnel may face legal barriers when carrying concealed firearms across state lines during official duties or while off-duty.
The proposal
The bill would permit Special Operations Forces members to carry concealed firearms in all states without state-specific permits or licenses.
The impact
Special Operations Forces members gain expanded concealed carry rights. State and local law enforcement may face jurisdiction questions. Gun policy varies by state.
Special Operations Forces members could defend themselves consistently across all states. This may improve personal security for personnel with tactical training and security clearances.
Military members would not need to obtain multiple state permits. This simplifies travel and reduces administrative burden for personnel with federal security clearances.
The bill asserts federal authority over trained, vetted military personnel. It treats Special Operations Forces similarly to other federal agents with carry privileges.
Provides uniform rules rather than requiring personnel to follow varying state and local regulations. This creates clearer standards for a specific federal workforce.
States traditionally regulate firearms within their borders. This bill overrides state and local gun laws for a specific group, potentially setting a precedent for other exemptions.
Law enforcement may struggle to quickly verify someone's Special Operations status during traffic stops or incidents. This could create confusion or safety risks for officers.
Different rules for different people based on military status could create confusion about who can carry where. This complicates enforcement of existing gun laws.
The bill does not clearly address off-duty status, retirement, or separation from service. Questions remain about when eligibility begins and ends.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.