Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 39 - 1.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Creates a plan for government to prepare for and handle financial emergencies.
The problem
Government needs better systems to respond quickly when unexpected money problems or crises happen.
The proposal
The bill sets up rules and processes for government agencies to prepare for financial emergencies and handle them when they occur.
The impact
Government agencies must develop emergency financial plans. Taxpayers may see faster government responses during money crises.
Having a plan before emergencies happen helps government respond faster. This could reduce confusion and costs during financial crises.
Advance planning means critical government programs like Social Security and military pay can continue during financial problems. People depending on these services get more security.
The bill establishes specific steps agencies must follow. This reduces guesswork and helps government act consistently across all departments.
When people know government has a plan, confidence remains more stable. This can prevent economic problems from getting worse.
The bill doesn't clearly explain how much it will cost to implement. Taxpayers may end up paying for new bureaucracy and planning systems.
Emergency powers might be used too easily or too often. Government could spend money during minor problems instead of real crises.
Without an official summary, it's hard to know exactly what the bill requires. Agencies may interpret rules differently, causing confusion.
New emergency procedures might require hiring more staff or creating new agencies. This could make government larger and more expensive.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.