Latest action: Held at the desk.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Marsha Blackburn (R-TN)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Creates rules for how cloud storage companies handle law enforcement requests for user data.
The problem
Law enforcement agencies request user data from cloud storage companies. There are unclear rules about when companies must give data and how to protect user privacy.
The proposal
The bill would set clear requirements for how cloud storage providers respond to government requests for user information and data stored in the cloud.
The impact
Cloud storage users, tech companies, and law enforcement agencies would all be affected by new rules governing data access and privacy protections.
Clear rules would require warrants before police access personal data. This protects innocent people from unauthorized searches of their private files.
Consistent standards across all cloud companies would prevent some users from having more protection than others. Everyone would follow the same rules.
Clear procedures would help law enforcement quickly get needed data with proper approval. It removes confusion about what companies must do.
Cloud companies would know exactly what the law requires. They could plan better and reduce legal uncertainty.
Strict warrant requirements could delay investigations when time matters. Police might lose evidence or fail to stop crimes quickly.
Strong privacy protections might make it harder for police to catch dangerous people. Criminals could hide evidence in the cloud.
Cloud companies may need new staff and systems to follow rules. Small tech businesses might struggle with these expenses.
The bill's exact requirements are not yet public. Details about warrants, emergency access, and timelines matter greatly.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.