Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal programs supporting patients and communities dealing with substance use disorders.
The problem
Existing federal programs helping people with addiction and their communities need renewal to continue providing treatment, recovery support, and prevention services.
The proposal
Extends authorization and funding for SAMHSA programs addressing substance abuse, mental health, and recovery support services in communities nationwide.
The impact
People struggling with addiction, their families, healthcare providers, and community organizations receive continued federal support for treatment and recovery programs.
Maintains federal funding for substance abuse treatment programs that help people get sober and recover. Without reauthorization, many treatment centers could lose resources needed to serve patients.
Keeps funding flowing to local programs that prevent addiction through education and early intervention. Communities can continue working with schools and youth organizations to reduce drug use.
Ensures ongoing funding for counseling, recovery housing, and peer support groups. These services help people stay sober after treatment and rebuild their lives.
Many people with addiction also have mental health conditions. Reauthorization keeps integrated treatment programs running that address both issues together.
The bill's exact cost and funding levels are unclear without the full text. Taxpayers should know how much federal money will be spent on these programs.
Reauthorizing existing programs continues current approaches without necessarily implementing new solutions or strategies shown to work better than current methods.
Without seeing the full bill, it's unclear what performance measures exist to ensure programs work effectively and money is spent wisely.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.