Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires review of how people are added to terrorist watchlists.
The problem
Concerns exist about fairness and accuracy of terrorist watchlist procedures. Some worry people may be wrongly added without proper review or appeal rights.
The proposal
The bill would require procedures to review and modify how individuals are placed on terrorist watchlists, likely adding safeguards and oversight mechanisms.
The impact
Affects law enforcement screening, national security operations, and individuals on watchlists. May change how agencies identify and monitor potential security threats.
Watchlist procedures may become fairer with formal review requirements. People could have better chances to challenge inclusion and correct errors.
Stricter review processes could prevent innocent people from being wrongly added to lists. This reduces inconvenience for travelers and accuracy problems.
Mandatory review procedures create clearer rules about how watchlists work. This accountability may build public trust in security agencies.
Additional review requirements could slow threat identification and watchlist updates. This might delay responses to emerging security risks.
New procedures require more resources and personnel for reviewing cases. Agencies may face increased costs and administrative work.
Appeals processes might result in removing some individuals agencies believe pose risks. This could affect law enforcement and intelligence operations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.