Latest action: Received in the Senate. Read twice. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 375.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Doris Matsui (D-CA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Requires emergency reporting procedures for science and technology communications.
The problem
Current emergency reporting systems may lack adequate protocols for rapid scientific and technological information dissemination during crises.
The proposal
Establishes emergency reporting requirements and procedures for communications related to science, technology, and related matters during declared emergencies.
The impact
Affects government agencies, communications providers, and the public by potentially changing how emergency information is shared during crises.
Clear reporting procedures could speed up how quickly emergency information reaches the public during crises. This might help people respond faster to dangers and protect themselves.
Having consistent emergency reporting rules across agencies could reduce confusion. Everyone would know what to do and when to do it.
Clear reporting requirements might improve how different government agencies work together during emergencies. Coordination saves time and reduces mixed messages.
New reporting requirements could create extra work and costs for agencies and technology companies. Small organizations might struggle more than large ones to meet new rules.
Without an official summary, it is difficult to know exactly what the bill requires. This uncertainty makes it hard to assess real consequences.
Complex reporting procedures might actually slow down emergency communications instead of speeding them up. Too many requirements could create bottlenecks.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10671
Securing Our Critical Infrastructure Act
HR 10695
United States Submarine Cable Security Policy Act of 2026
HR 7022
Mystic Alerts Act
S 5668
Methane Monitoring Science Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.