Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 396.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Paul Gosar (R-AZ)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill to improve home rule and governance powers for Washington, D.C.
The problem
D.C. has limited self-governance authority compared to states. Congress maintains significant control over D.C. laws and budgets, restricting local decision-making.
The proposal
Expands D.C.'s home rule powers by increasing local authority over budget, laws, and governance while reducing congressional oversight and control.
The impact
D.C. residents gain more local control over city decisions. Congress loses some oversight authority. Effects on federal government operations and D.C. services vary by specific provisions.
D.C. residents could make more decisions about their own city without waiting for Congress. This gives the city more power to solve problems quickly based on what residents want.
D.C. residents pay taxes but have no voting power in Congress. More home rule means residents have greater say over laws affecting their community.
Local leaders can pass laws and budgets without getting congressional approval. This allows D.C. to respond quickly to city needs like schools, roads, and public safety.
Other major cities run themselves with more freedom. Giving D.C. similar powers makes the system fairer and more consistent.
The bill's specific provisions aren't detailed in available summaries. Without details, it's hard to predict all consequences or costs.
Congress would have less ability to review D.C. decisions. This could reduce accountability if D.C. leaders make poor budget or policy choices.
D.C. might struggle financially without congressional oversight or support. A major budget mistake could harm services for residents.
The federal government operates in D.C. More local power could create conflicts over building regulations, taxes, and policies affecting federal offices and workers.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.