Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase federal funding and support for crime prevention and law enforcement activities.
The problem
Rising crime rates and concerns about public safety have prompted calls for stronger federal investment in law enforcement resources and community protection programs.
The proposal
Allocates federal funding to support law enforcement agencies, crime prevention initiatives, and related protective services across states and local communities.
The impact
Law enforcement agencies, communities, taxpayers, and public safety programs receive increased resources. Affects federal budget allocation and local policing capabilities.
Additional federal funding helps local police departments hire more officers and purchase better equipment. This can improve response times and community protection in underfunded areas.
Federal investment supports evidence-based crime prevention and community safety initiatives. These programs can help reduce crime rates and improve neighborhood safety.
Federal funding creates jobs in law enforcement and related fields. Money spent on equipment and services supports local businesses and the economy.
Federal support can help establish consistent law enforcement training and standards nationwide. This improves professional practices across different jurisdictions.
New federal funding requires taxpayer money and increases the national budget deficit. This diverts resources from other federal priorities and programs.
Increased law enforcement funding could lead to more aggressive policing tactics or military-style equipment in communities. This raises civil liberties and community relations concerns.
Simply providing more funding does not guarantee reduced crime if underlying causes are not addressed. Money alone may not solve root problems.
Increased funding requires strong oversight to prevent waste and misuse. Without proper accountability measures, money may not be spent effectively.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.