Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Sets payment rules for terrorism victims who won judgments against state sponsors.
The problem
Havlish plaintiffs won a judgment against Iran for state-sponsored terrorism. Rules are needed for how payments get distributed to these settling creditors.
The proposal
Amends terrorism victim compensation law to establish specific procedures and rules for distributing settlement payments to Havlish judgment creditors.
The impact
Terrorism victims and their families receive clearer payment processes. Iran's assets used for compensation. U.S. courts enforcing terrorism judgments against foreign governments.
Provides clear rules so Americans harmed by state-sponsored terrorism can actually receive money owed to them. Makes the payment process predictable and fair for all victims.
Makes it harder for countries that sponsor terrorism to avoid paying judgments. Shows serious consequences for countries that harm Americans.
Creates standard procedures instead of case-by-case decisions. Reduces confusion about payment priorities and distribution methods.
Seizing foreign government assets for payments could damage diplomatic relationships. Other nations might retaliate against U.S. interests or assets abroad.
Iran has few accessible assets in U.S. jurisdiction. Money available for actual payments might be very limited despite clear rules.
May create disputes about which assets can be seized and when. Could lead to more lawsuits about interpretation of payment rules.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.