Latest action: Received in the Senate.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Elise Stefanik (R-NY)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Changes Washington D.C.'s cash bail system for criminal defendants.
The problem
DC's current bail system may use money to keep accused people in jail. Reformers argue this harms poor defendants who cannot afford bail.
The proposal
The bill modifies DC's cash bail rules, though specific changes require official text review. Likely addresses bail amounts, detention standards, or defendant release options.
The impact
Accused criminals, courts, and crime victims in DC. Changes how bail decisions are made and who gets released before trial.
People without money wouldn't stay in jail just because they're poor. This treats wealthy and poor accused people more equally. Fair treatment helps protect people's rights.
Fewer people held only for money bail means less crowded jails. This saves taxpayers money on jail operations. Overcrowded jails create safety problems.
People not in jail can keep their jobs and care for families. Children don't lose parents before trial. This supports family stability.
People released can work with lawyers better and attend court. This helps people defend themselves fairly. Better preparation leads to fairer trials.
Releasing more accused people before trial might increase crime. Dangerous people might commit more crimes while awaiting trial. Victims and communities could be harmed.
Without money bail, some accused people might not return for trial. This wastes court time and resources. Cases may be delayed or dismissed.
Federal law might override DC's own bail decisions. Local leaders lose power to handle their own justice system. States and cities prefer controlling their own courts.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 4307
Enhancing Detection of Human Trafficking Act
HR 10638
Skills Against Violence Act of 2026
HR 10565
Sexual Abuse Services in Detention Act
HR 10543
PREP Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.