Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Restricts Super PACs from coordinating with candidates and their campaigns.
The problem
Super PACs can currently work closely with candidates they support, raising concerns about unlimited money influencing elections and reducing transparency in campaign finance.
The proposal
This bill would create new legal restrictions preventing Super PACs from coordinating their spending and strategy with candidates or their official campaign teams.
The impact
Candidates, Super PACs, and political campaigns would face stricter rules on how they communicate and work together during elections.
Limiting coordination between candidates and Super PACs could reduce the appearance that wealthy donors have special access or influence over elected officials. This may help restore public trust in elections.
Stricter coordination rules could make it clearer where campaign money comes from and how it is spent. Voters would have better information about who is funding political messages.
Candidates with fewer wealthy supporters might benefit if Super PACs cannot strategically coordinate with well-funded campaigns. This could make races more competitive.
By limiting Super PAC influence, candidates might rely more on small donations from regular citizens, giving ordinary voters more importance in elections.
Restricting coordination could be seen as limiting the free speech rights of Super PACs and candidates. Courts have protected political spending as free speech in past cases.
It can be difficult to prove that a candidate and Super PAC are secretly coordinating. This law might be hard to enforce fairly and could lead to legal battles.
Even with these restrictions, wealthy donors could still support Super PACs independently. The bill might not actually reduce the influence of money in politics.
Candidates and their supporters might struggle to communicate effectively, making it harder to run organized campaigns or respond quickly to opponents.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.