Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Proposes a constitutional amendment to regulate money in elections and political campaigns.
The problem
Large amounts of money in elections may give wealthy donors more influence over politicians and policy decisions than ordinary voters.
The proposal
This constitutional amendment would allow Congress and states to set limits on campaign contributions and spending by individuals, groups, and corporations in elections.
The impact
Politicians, donors, campaigns, and voters would all be affected by new rules about who can spend money to influence elections.
Limiting campaign money could give ordinary voters more equal voice in elections. When fewer wealthy people control campaign funds, politicians might listen to more people.
Capping political spending and donations might reduce the appearance that politicians favor big donors. It could build public trust in government.
Campaign spending limits could help candidates without wealthy supporters compete fairly. Candidates could focus on ideas instead of raising money.
When people feel their vote matters equally, they may be more likely to vote. This could improve democracy by engaging more citizens.
Spending money on campaigns is considered political speech. Restricting it could conflict with First Amendment free speech protections that courts have recognized.
Sitting politicians already have name recognition. Campaign spending limits could make it harder for challengers to compete, protecting politicians already in power.
Spending limits might force campaign money into less transparent groups. People could donate secretly instead of openly, making corruption harder to detect.
Limiting campaign money requires new enforcement rules and agencies. This creates bureaucracy and legal disputes about what counts as campaign spending.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.