Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allows the government to recover money from officials convicted of corruption.
The problem
Public officials convicted of corruption may keep money they gained illegally. This undermines trust in government and leaves victims without compensation.
The proposal
Creates a legal process to seize and return money from officials convicted of corruption-related crimes to the government or affected parties.
The impact
Government officials, convicted criminals, taxpayers, and victims of corruption could be affected through recovered funds and stricter accountability measures.
Allows the government to reclaim funds that corrupt officials obtained illegally. This money can be returned to taxpayers or used for public purposes.
Creates real financial consequences for corruption, deterring officials from breaking the law. Officials know they cannot keep illegal gains.
Money recovered can be used to compensate people harmed by corruption. This provides some justice for those who suffered losses.
Shows that government takes corruption seriously and punishes it financially. This may help citizens trust their institutions more.
Creating new clawback procedures could complicate the legal system and create disputes about how much money qualifies. Courts may spend resources debating these rules.
Some argue taking money after criminal penalties are already applied amounts to punishing someone twice for the same crime. This raises constitutional fairness questions.
Actually recovering money can be difficult if assets are hidden or spent. Enforcement could be expensive and time-consuming.
Seizing assets may harm an official's family members who depend on income or property. Determining what counts as ill-gotten gains requires careful judgment.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
SRES 929
A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate regarding equity stakes held by the Federal Government in private companies.
HR 5235
Skills-Based Federal Contracting Act of 2025
HR 2332
SHARE Act of 2026
HR 9191
National Fossil Act of 2026
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.